THE JEWISH TAKE-OVER OF SOUTH AFRICA

by Creativity Reverend Maritz – December 30, 2014


In the 19th century the British fought wars to subject the Boer states to British Rule. In 1948, the Boers took power democratically, with the election of the National Party. In the 1960s the government of Hendrik Verwoerd took power and implemented the formal separate but equal policies in South Africa. These policies made South Africa the economically strongest nation in Africa, and gave the blacks in South Africa (and the whites) the highest standards of living of any African nation. Verwoerd’s policies had two main opponents. One was a Jew named Harry Oppenheimer, the other a Jew named Anton Ruppert. Both controlled banking monopolies in the country, and wanted “rights” extended to black South Africans for the purpose of extending their money lending business. Oppenheimer had ties to the Rothschild banking family and to the US CIA, which throughout the 1970s through 1990s supported the overthrow of white South African rule, at the direction of the Jew Henry Kissinger. Oppenheimer lobbied the Rothschilds to overthrow Verwoerd, who had publicly denounced the Jewish banking monopolies in Parliament. The Rothschilds secured the support of the Rockefeller, Carnegie and other “Anglo” families in the United States, and had those institutions lobby against the white government. Rockfeller influenced the Council on Foreign Relations and its members in the US government in particular to oppose white rule.

The African National Congress (ANC) was founded by Lionel Bernstein, Bob Hepple, Dennis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, Hazel Goldreich and James Kantor, with a few African front men – Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki (father of Thabo Mbeki), Raymond Mhlaba, and Ahmed Kathrada. In this, the ANC followed the model the Jews established when they founded the NAACP in the United States, with the exception that the ANC was a much more violent and openly communist organization. These Jews and their African National Congress received funding and support from both the Soviet Union and the US CIA. In particular, Ruth First, the Jewish wife of Jewish Soviet KGB Colonel Joe Slovo, a leader of the South African Communist Party, was primarily responsible for funneling funds to this “African” National Congress. In 1966 the CIA financed the assassination of President Verwoerd, through their “lone nut” operative Demetrio Tsafendas, a Greek immigrant to South Africa. In particular, Oppenheimer’s South African Foundation funneled CIA money to Hendrik Van Den Bergh of the South African Security Police and John Vorster, the Minister of Justice, who were the men who recruited Tsafendas to assassinate Verwoerd.

By the 1970s the Jewish campaign to subvert South Africa was having no effect. The economy was unaffected by sanctions and communist unrest was minimal – though much was made of it in the Jewish owned elements of the US press. In 1978 the CIA recruited Pik Botha, the South African foreign minister, as a spy and used him to subvert the South African government, working with Samuel Huntington and Chester Crocker, Botha was assigned to undermine and alter the attitudes of the South African government regarding black rule. Botha recruited Minister of Sports Piet Koornhof -and Head of Military Intelligence General Tienie Groenewald to the CIA-Jew operation. Groenewald in particular passed on the names of Afrikaaner nationalist and white rights activists to MI6 and the CIA, and arranged for acts of violence and harassment, COINTELPRO style, against Boer activists in the country. In the late 1970s and the early 1980s the banking families, Oppenheimer in particular, began to speculate in the Rand for the purpose of devaluing the currency. Inflation rose to 7 percent and growth fell to 3 percent, with inflation reaching 16 percent in the early 1980s.

In 1989 a Freemason with ties to B’nai B’rith, the Jewish Masonic fraternity which controls the ADL, was elected President of South Africa. President Frederik De Klerk was a Jewish-backed candidate with ties to the international Zionist establishment. De Klerk worked for, and eventually achieved, the Jewish goal of black rule in South Africa. The IMF (Rothschild) – added pressure by threatening that if Mandela will not be released – the IMF will flood the country with Russian diamonds and force a inflation onto the country. The South Africa’s central bank was run by a Jew named Gill Marcus (2009-2014), Trevor Manuel, a Jew, was the Minister of Finance (1996–2009). Alec Erwin, a Jew, was the Minister of Trade and Industry (1996-2004). Helena Dolny, the Jewish ex-wife of KGB Colonel Joe Slovo, is the Executive Director at First National Bank. She also is the Executive Director at First Rand. Ronnie Kasrils, a Jew, was the Minister of Intelligence (2004 to 2008). Louise Tager, a Jew, is chairman of the railway system, Spoornet. Michael Katz, a Jew, is the chief consultant on taxation. Meyer Kahn, a Jew, is the managing director of the police service. Three Jews – Richard Goldstone, Arthur Chaskalson, and Albert Sachs – sat on the South African Supreme Court. What has happened in South Africa under the name of “democracy” and “diversity” has been the Jewish takeover of their country. As with all Jewish governments, South Africa is now a failed nation. It is poor, it is crime ridden, and it is not safe to walk the streets.

The Jews wage war on anyone who opposes their total domination of the world’s economy. They also work to make sure they control the governments of every single developed country in the world. Jews use whatever tools they can – phony allegations of “racism” or pleas for “democracy”, for instance – to win stupid, thoughtless non-Jews to their cause, but all celebrated communist, socialist, “democratic” and/or anti-racist groups in the world are Jewish run and Jewish financed.

Advertisements

Author: National-Satanist

Just another blue-eyed devil...

6 thoughts on “THE JEWISH TAKE-OVER OF SOUTH AFRICA”

  1. According to the February 1992 edition of Searchlight, an “anti-fascist” magazine in Great Britain, two self-professed members of the Civil Cooperation Bureau (CCB), an undercover unit of the South African security police, fled to England after awaiting trial for over a year in connection with the bombing of a taxi line which injured 15 Black people. The two fugitives, Adrian Maritz and Henry Martin, reported that as CCB operatives, they were instructed by superiors to join the Church of the Creator in order to recruit South African racists into a “dirty war” against the African National Congress (ANC). The two COTC members also alleged that they had knowledge of “several operations through which large quantities of arms were delivered to the Zulu Inkatha Party”; the security force is reputed to have used armed Inkatha members in a “campaign of atrocities” waged in Black townships.

    Nelson Mandela, the leader of the ANC, had visited the two men in a South African hospital after they had gone on a hunger strike to protest their arrests. He declared himself “convinced they have very valuable information about the role of the National Intelligence Service and military intelligence, who instructed them to commit some heinous offences.”

    To date, further developments regarding these allegations remain unclear.

    Nonetheless, Searchlight also reported in the same issue that two other COTC activists, Jurgen Matthews White and Johannes Jurgens Grobbelaar, were killed in a gun battle with South African police while they were reportedly attempting to smuggle weapons and explosives into an alleged “survivalist” compound in Namibia. The two “Creators” were stopped by police suspicious that their vehicle had been stolen. According to the report, while being escorted to a nearby police station, the two detonated a smoke bomb and attempted to escape. After coming across their abandoned vehicle five miles away, police came under fire from the two suspects. who lay in ambush. Two officers were shot, one fatally, before law enforcement agents returned fire. The COTC members died in the gun battle.

    http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/american/adl/cotc/south-africa.html

    Like

  2. THE AMERICAN press in recent months has carried a number of reports of protests by South African students against their government’s policy of racial separation, or apartheid. “White Students Rebelling Against Government Discrimination,” the Reuters reports shriek, followed by vivid accounts of truncheon-wielding policemen wading into crowds of peacefully protesting students and brutally cracking skulls left and right. One news story told of policemen chasing students from the University of Cape Town who sought refuge in St. George’s Cathedral, battering them senseless, and dragging them out, leaving pools of blood among the pews.

    Editorial comment accompanying these reports creates the impression that the idealistic, fair-minded young people of South Africa abhor the racial policies of their backward and repressive government and are striving to bring about an end to apartheid and establish Black-White equality.

    As is often the case with press coverage of domestic issues, all in South Africa is not quite as the newspapers would lead us to believe.

    In order to understand the true state of affairs in South Africa it is first necessary to recognize that there are three distinct “White” communities in that country: Afrikaans-speakers (Boers), English-speaking Gentiles, and Jews (who also speak English).

    The Boers, as the country’s largest White community, are politically dominant and are represented principally through the National Party. They were the original settlers of South Africa and have a strong sense of racial identity and racial pride. They have been able to prevent, to a substantial extent, the subversion of their institutions by alien elements.

    The English-speaking Gentiles are a mixed bag. The majority of them also have a sense of racial pride and support their government’s policy of apartheid. But they have lost control of their institutions. Like their English-speaking kinsmen around the world, they have been infected with neo-liberalism. They are brainwashed by their newspapers and in their schools and churches. A minority have fallen into decadence and become enemies of their people.

    The Jews are the real worm in the South African apple. Flocking to South Africa after the discovery of gold and diamonds there, they concentrated in the largest cities and had soon staked their claim to a lion’s share of the economic action.

    One enormously rich Jew, Harry Oppenheimer, has managed to acquire almost complete control over the South African diamond, gold, and uranium mining industries. Other Jews took over banks, English-language newspapers, and industries not already in billionaire Oppenheimer’s pocket.

    Jews have grown to number more than 15 percent of the population of Johannesburg, South Africa’s largest city, and they completely dominate the financial and mercantile life there. Since the English population is much more urbanized than the Afrikaner population, many of whom remain farmers, it is principally the English who have been affected by the Jewish presence.

    A Jewess, Helen Suzman, heads South Africa’s neo-liberal Progressive Party and is the only representative of that party in the parliament. There she regularly releases tirades against the entire structure of apartheid, including the laws against miscegenation. The Oppenheimer press gives extensive coverage to her views.

    It is in the universities, however, that the Jewish spirit really manifests itself. As in America, all Jews of college age are students, so that they constitute a numerically strong and well-organized radical element at several of the major South African universities. The student protestors whose demonstrations have been recently reported in the American press were more than 50 percent Jewish (although this interesting statistic was omitted from the press reports).

    Likewise, when police broke up a communist ring a few years ago which had been supplying arms to Black revolutionary groups and attempting to foment a rebellion against White rule in South Africa, all the ringleaders were found to be either Jewish students or Jewish professors.

    Thus, despite misleading indications to the contrary, the Whites of South Africa remain one of the most racially self-conscious and spiritually healthy White populations on the planet. Because they have failed to curb a viciously destructive group of aliens in their midst, however, they are in the beginning stages of dissolution and decadence. And, because of their minority status in a sea of hostile Blacks, decadence is a luxury which the Whites of South Africa cannot afford.

    – WILLIAM LUTHER PIERCE, ‘SUBVERSION IN SOUTH AFRICA’

    Like

  3. When I wrote NATURE’S ETERNAL RELIGION in 1971 I predicted (among other items) the demise of two White dominated South African countries, namely Rhodesia, and the Republic of South Africa, because of their tolerant but rather stupid racial policies, (but no more so than the U.S.). Rhodesia has now been fully niggerized and the White Man massacred and/or driven out, as South Africa soon will be.

    I remember attending a lecture at the sumptuous home of the late Countess Guardabassa in Palm Beach, Florida in the early 70’s. The speaker was the late Carol Dunn of LIBERTY LOBBY. I remember her ebullient report on how wonderful things were in Rhodesia, what a beautiful clean city was Salisbury, one of the finest little cities in the world. All these bad reports of the world press about Rhodesia mistreating the blacks were all wrong. Why Rhodesia was doing everything possible for the blacks, giving them work, giving them homes, trying to educate them, and as some (mulattoes, no doubt) got a scintilla of education, they were taught to partake in, and given, an ever increasing role in the government itself. To hear her gush and bubble with optimism, Rhodesia was a nigger’s paradise, and it probably was, or is as close as the niggers can ever realistically wish for.

    Anyway, she, too, thought it was great and the world at large was all wrong in heaping condemnation on Rhodesia’s alleged mistreatment of the blacks. In an area that was built by the White Man and that a century ago had very few aborigines, the niggers at that time (1970) already outnumbered the Whites 16 to 1.

    A friend of mine and I privately discussed her speech later. We came to the (then) astounding conclusion that Rhodesia was actually “farming niggers”, in short feeding and breeding them at a rate that would soon consume the country. And that is just what happened. Even at that time (1970) I suspected that lan Smith, the then darling of the Kosher Konservatives, was a race traitor and selling the Whites down the river. History proved I was right.

    We now come to Rhodesia only a decade later and what do we find? Rhodesia is no more. The land is still there but the White Man is no longer in control, nor in existence, except for a few toadies that hold the ruins together, such as they are. The “country” is now called Zimbabwe and the once clean, beautiful city of Salisbury is called Harare. Two rival gangs of black savages are now fighting each other for control of the corpse. There is an article in the January 13, (85) Atlanta Constitution telling about the peculiar political workings of black “democracy” in that now nigger dominated country. It seems that opposition leader Joshua Nkomo came into town for a campaign stop in Harare and supporters of Prime Minister Robert Mugabe fired nine bullets into his bullet proof car and hurled an avalanche of rocks to properly top it off in true niggerly fashion. This is black “uhuru” (freedom) at its best and even that shabby structure will survive only as long as the White taxpayers of the United States can be kept snookered into subsidizing these useless savages to the tune of hundreds of millions.

    The Republic of South Africa is larger and more formidable than was little Rhodesia, but it is going down the same track to black oblivion as did Rhodesia a few years earlier. We have the same techniques being utilized by the Jewish powerhouse, the same slogans, the same accusations and the same line of traitors undermining the structure from the inside.

    The finances, the news media and the government of South Africa are in the hands of the Jewish Oppenheimer family and their racial cohorts who own the vast DeBeers gold and diamond mines, and just about everything else in South Africa. Manipulating him on a string, the Jews have placed their own puppet at the head of the South African government. The treachery of Prime Minister P.W. Botha is matched (or perhaps exceeded) by that lowest of all human cretins – the race traitor from our own country who is now “visiting” that nigger-plagued country and agitating the stupid and brutish animals. His name happens to be Senator Edward Kennedy, who is following in the footsteps of his late brother Robert who was in South Africa on a similar “Hate Whitey” mission nineteen years earlier.

    Lately I listened to “CROSSFIRE”, a nightly program where a celebrity or public figure is interviewed by Tom Braden “on the Left” and Pat Buchanan “on the Right”, supposedly representing two diametrically opposed views. They play a good game on the average boob-tube yokel who is easily convinced that he is genuinely hearing both sides from diametrically opposed viewpoints.

    This particular night they had the South African Ambassador to the U. S. on the hot seat, with Pat Buchanan supposedly defending the Ambassador, and the Ambassador supposedly defending apartheid and the Republic Of South Africa’s position. To an experienced observer it seemed exceedingly strange how the two defenders consistently failed to review the grisly fate that befell the White citizens of the Belgian Congo, of Angola, or Rhodesia, when the black savages took over. At best they quibbled over the academic issue of “rights” and other demagogic trappery but never considered the fate or the interests of the White people. Tom Braden “on the left”, however, kept admonishing repeatedly the impending horrors of race war (horrible! horrible! horrible!) unless the niggers got it all, and such race war was to be avoided at all costs, even though the Whites who built the country went down the drain, even though civilization reverted back to the barbarism of the savage.

    – BEN KLASSEN, ‘BUILDING A WHITER & BRIGHTER WORLD’

    Like

  4. Another African Sinkhole Yet in 2008 even one of the primary leaders of the anti-apartheid movement, John Minto, declined to accept a nomination for the Companion of O. R. Tambo Award given to those outside South Africa who contributed to the ending of apartheid.4 Even Minto is disappointed with the failure of South Africa to become the paragon of Black justice, culture, and virtue that multitudes assumed was only being prevented by the Boer brutes. But while he is also displeased with Zimbabwe’s ruler, Robert Mugabe, is this because Minto, or any others of his ilk, have looked at the travesty called Black Africa and reconsidered that perhaps the rule of the European was preferable? Heaven forbid. Like the communist who insists that Marxism has failed only because it has not been implemented properly, Minto et al. will not concede that African rule per se is the problem. Rather, although the promise of a Black paradise in Southern Africa has turned to hell, he is now focusing on “minority rule” for New Zealand, and has become one of the luminaries of the recently formed Mana Party of former Maori Party Member of Parliament Hone Harawira.5

    As for Hone, his own ideals are something less than liberal, but that is all the better for some whites possessed of a masochistic desire to be bootlickers for other races. Hone’s replies from his Parliamentary office to e-mails from Pakeha6 referred to “white motherf…ers”7 White liberals would be fine with being called “white motherf…ers,” but more disquieting for liberaldom is Harawira’s distaste at the thought of his daughter coming home with a white boyfriend.8 Such forthright sentiments spill the beans on New Zealand’s posturing on the world stage as the epitome of racial brother- and sisterhood. However, what none of these enthusiasts for the destruction of white rule in Africa have understood is that behind the slogans of “human rights” and “equality” stand the very interests that these Leftists and liberals thought they were opposing: International capitalism. One of the great myths of recent history is that apartheid existed in the interests of monopoly-capitalism. To the contrary, apartheid was inaugurated as a resistance to monopoly- capitalism, and to protect basic livelihoods from those who saw Black labor as the means of forcing living conditions to the lowest denominator.

    “White Workers of the World Unite for a White South Africa”
    How many of those who were committed to the dispossession of the Afrikaner “exploiters” have heard of the epochal 1922 revolt on the Rand? This Afrikaner syndicalist revolt against the mining interests was the catalyst for the victory of a Nationalist-Labour alliance that inaugurated the first steps towards apartheid. The same mostly Jewish monopolists who had opposed the Afrikaner from start to finish intended to use Black labor to undermine the white miners. In late 1922 the Chamber of Mines announced that 25 semi-skilled job levels reserved for Whites would be given to Blacks, and that there would be thousands of White redundancies. At the same time coal mine owners announced wage cuts. The Mineworkers Union called a General Strike. While the Communist Party was involved, the main influences were the Afrikaner Mynwerkersbond; mostly former Boer farmers and war veterans who had been left destitute by the British scorched earth policy during the Anglo-Boer War, and allied Labour Party supporters. When the mineworkers raised their banners proclaiming “Keep South Africa White” and “White Workers of the World Unite for a White South Africa,” the Communists were in no position to object. The coal miners, gold miners, engineers, and power workers on the Rand voted to strike and had the backing of both the Labour Party and the National Party. Prime Minister Jan Smuts urged the Chamber of Mines to negotiate, but they refused, and instead arrogantly announced a new labor ratio of 2 Whites to 21 Blacks, meaning many more redundancies. The Labour Party-backed South African Industrial Federation created a “strike commando” to resist Black scab labor, although resisting calls for a General Strike. Smuts caved in to the demands of the monopolists and ordered the miners back to work. In response, the Miner Councils of Action deployed commandos throughout the Rand. Smuts responded with force and three Whites were killed by police at Boksburg. The National Party demanded a Parliamentary enquiry. The SA Industrial Federation wanted to negotiate but the Chamber refused. Only then was a General Strike proclaimed. Armed commandos seized Johannesburg and proclaimed a “White Workers’ Republic.” Mine officials, bosses, and Black scabs were executed. Government forces attacked, and the air force levelled the miners’ quarters. On March 14 1922 the strike headquarters was overtaken, and the strike leaders were killed. The last resistance was put down on March 16.9 Such was the outrage against Smuts that in 1924 the Afrikaner Nationalists, in alliance with the Labour Party, assumed Office, and starting with labor laws, the foundations of apartheid began to be laid.10

    Plutocratic Crusade Against Afrikaners
    As in 1922 the primary enemy of the Afrikaner was the Oppenheimer mining, industrial and media empire, which includes Anglo-American Corp., and DeBeers. The traditional enemies of the Afrikaner had always been “Anglicized” Jews, from the time of the First Anglo-Boer War when the likes of Alfred Beit and the Rothschild interests around Cecil Rhodes tried to consolidate their authority under the authority of the British Flag.11 However there was no more persistent enemy of the Afrikaner than the Oppenheimer dynasty, routinely referred to in the early Afrikaner Nationalist press as the “Hoggenheimers.” The head of the dynasty during most of the apartheid era was Harry F. Oppenheimer. He became a Member of Parliament for the United Party when that party was the main opposition to the Nationalists. When anti-Nationalist veterans founded the militant Torch commando in 1950 Oppenheimer provided the funding.12 When the Progressive Party was formed by a breakaway from United in 1959 Harry F. became the financial patron of the Party. When the Progressives first contested the Coloured seats in 1965 Harry F. funded all the campaigns then and subsequently, with 40,000 Rand annually. In 1966 he funded with Progressive General Election campaign with 50,000 Rand.13 Something of Harry F.’s motives can be discerned from his statement on the formation of the liberal think tank, the South Africa Foundation in 1960: In effect the advent of the South Africa Foundation reflects the return of big business to active politics. Picture the industrial revolution that will take place in Africa if the Black Man’s economic fetters are struck from him! Think of the millions of skilled men who will enter the labour market. Think of the vast new consuming public! I think I can claim the main credit for this exciting vision of the new Africa, yet all that I have done really is to allow myself to be guided by the best interests of Anglo-American.14 Nearly two decades later Harry F. was explaining: “Nationalist politics have made it impossible to make use of Black labour.”15 Perhaps “the good and the righteous” should contemplate that, the next time they pontificate about how they “marched against apartheid”? Up until the assassination of Verwoerd on September 6, 1966 the Nationalists remained acutely aware of the identity of their real adversaries, Prime Minister Malan stating: “What we have against us is money power, principally under the leadership of Oppenheimer.”16

    If the Left ever take some cognizance of their guru Professor Noam Chomsky on such issues they might reach some understanding, but can the willfully blind and the psychologically problematic be changed?: See, capitalism is not fundamentally racist – it can exploit racism for its purposes, but racism isn’t built into it. Capitalism basically wants people to be interchangeable cogs, and differences among them, such as on the basis of race, usually are not functional. I mean, they may be functional for a period, like if you want a super-exploited workforce or something, but those situations are kind of anomalous. Over the long term you can expect capitalism to be antiracist – just because it is anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic – there is no reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available just as consumers and producers, interchangeable cogs who will purchase all that junk that is produced – that’s their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant, and usually a nuisance.17 Ironically, the Rightist position on capitalism has perhaps been no more cogently expressed than by this Leftist academic. Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd, Prime Minister of South Africa, regarded as the “architect of apartheid,” and a statesman of immense stature who had the respect of Black Africa, provided the philosophical basis for separate development and the defense of the European in Africa.18 After his assassination in 1966 his successors lacked the ideological coherence and a comprehension of the forces working against them, and adopted a defensive and inadequate — even apologetic — position. They tried to counter their opponents defensively, from the viewpoint of “the white man’s burden” instead of from the standpoint of white survival that had been the basis of Nationalist doctrine until the death of Verwoerd. In 1962 Verwoerd stated of these anti-Afrikaner forces in a speech before Parliament: The directors, when they meet, hold private discussions. In the case of such a powerful body there is also a central body which lays down basic policy.

    The influence of that central body, to say the least, must be great in our economic life. Nobody knows, however, what they discuss there. In the course of his speeches, Mr Oppenheimer, the leader, makes political statements; he discusses political policy, he tires to exercise political influence. He even supports a political party. . . . In other words he has political aims; he wants to steer things in a certain direction. He can secretly cause a great many things to happen. In other words, he can pull strings. With all that money power and with his powerful machine which is spread over the whole country, he can, if he so chooses, exercise enormous interference against the Government and against the state.19 In 1953 even Saint Nelson stated of the Oppenheimer empire: Rather than attempt the costly, dubious and dangerous task of crushing the nonEuropean mass movements by force, they would seek to divert it with fine words and promises and divide it by giving concessions and bribes to a privileged minority.20 Yet when Harry F. died in 2000 Saint Nelson eulogized: His contribution to building a partnership between Big Business and the new democratic government in the first period of democratic rule can never be appreciated too much.21 Predictably, Saint Nelson had whored himself to plutocracy, and has received the worshipful accolades of the world ever since. It was the pattern that was followed all over post-colonial Africa, where plutocratic neo-colonialism arose over the ruins of the European empires.

    The Long Road to Capitalist Serfdom
    While journalists, politicians, clerics, academics, and other sundry mental retards worship Mandela as the Risen Christ, even getting tearful when they speak His name, South Africa has descended into a hell on earth, as becomes evident not only by reading news sources from South Africa such as the journal Impact, but when one meets an Afrikaner refugee (of which there are many in New Zealand) who can be persuaded to open up on the reason they left their ancestral homeland. What has been the result of post-apartheid South Africa? The answer is that the “anti-apartheid struggle” ushered a regime of privatization and globalization on the ruins of the state-directed economic structure that the Afrikaners created. So far from being exploitive capitalists, whipping old Darkie with the sjambok, as stereotyped by Marxist propaganda and the democratic press, the Afrikaners were an anomaly in the world economy: the last of a traditional European peasantry bonded to faith, blood, and land. The industrial structure included the parastatals, state-owned or partly owned corporations. With the advent of Saint Nelson’s ANC/Communist Party coalition, as one would expect, the “comrades” have set about delivering South Africa to international capitalism. In 1996 Saint Nelson, despite once having supported nationalization, stated: “Privatisation is the fundamental policy of the ANC and will remain so.”22 ANC economics adviser C. Mostert has detailed the history and ideology of privatization in South Africa, stating that the Nationalists introduced state supervision of the economy in 1948; a policy which began to be dismantled by the [corrupted] National Party in 1987, and which has been continued by the ANC Government.23 Mostert states that the ANC has embarked on a policy recommended by the International Monetary Fund. He states that the word “privatisation” is not generally used, but rather it is the phrase “restructuring of state assets,” which is widely associated with privatization. The Government Communication and Information Service (GCIS) uses the two phrases interchangeably when it describes economic developments and policy.24 He writes: These privatization initiatives have taken different forms and include: • The complete sale of companies, like Sun Air and seven radio stations to consortiums; • Build, Operate and Transfer arrangements for the building of roads; • The opening of private-public partnerships at local government level for the provision of services like water; • Selling a partial stake (30%) in Telkom to combined American-Malaysian consortium; and • The proposed sale of a 25%-30% stake of South African Airways The ANC has stated: “Eskom is one of a host of government owned parastatals created during the apartheid era which the democratically elected government has set out to privatise in a bid to raise money.”25 Why does a country that had hitherto been so prosperous now need to raise capital by selling off its assets? The answer lies in South Africa having been quickly reduced to a basket case, a bottomless economic sinkhole, like every other “decolonized” state on the Dark Continent. The plutocrats who pushed for the destruction of so prosperous a nation apparently had a long-term dialectical plan that seemed, in the short-term, to undermine their profitability. In the long term, however, the impoverishment of South Africa by the incompetence that invariably results from “majority rule” has obliged South Africa to become an open economy operating an ongoing garage sale. But so long as South Africa now has universal franchise and has put the redundant Boer in his place, it matters not to most of the useful idiots of the Left who were merely performing their historic role as lickspittles of Money.

    4 – “John Minto Refuses South African Award,” January 28, 2008, http://ridwanlaher.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-minto-refuses-south-african-award.html
    5 – Bryce Edwards, “The Mana Party leadership widens – roles for Bradford, Sykes, Minto and Jackson,” Liberation, August 8, 2011, http://liberation.typepad.com/liberation/2011/08/the-mana-party-leadership-widensroles-for-bradford-sykes-minto-and-jackson.html
    6 – Pakeha, the Maori name for Euro-New Zealanders is widely used, but is often suspected as being derogatory. However, the name is likely to come from Pakepakeha, a class of white skinned sea demi-gods in Maori mythology.
    7 – “Hone’s racist outburst within his rights – de Bres,” TV3 News, November 8, 2009, http://www.3news.co.nz/Hone-Harawiras-racist-outburst-within-his-rights—deBres/tabid/209/articleID/128701/Default.aspx
    8 – Tim Watkin, Pundit, “Hone Harawira and the partnership pickle,” September 15, 2011, http://pundit.co.nz/content/hone-harawira-and-the-partnership-pickle
    9 – J. Jewell, “ White Revolt on the Rand 1922,” A Salute to Dr Hendrik Verwoerd & the Boer Folk, ed. K. R. Bolton (Paraparaumu Beach, New Zealand: Renaissance Press), pp. 6-10.
    10 – Ibid., 9-10.
    11 – Harvard historian Dr. Carroll Quigley wrote of this: “With financial support from Lord Rothschild and Alfred Beit [Rhodes] was able to monopolize the diamond mines of South Africa as De Beers Consolidated Mines and to build up a great gold mining enterprise as Consolidated Gold Fields.” C. Quigley, Tragedy & Hope (New York: Macmillan, 1966), p. 130. Justice, the newspaper of the Social Democratic Federation of H. M. Hyndman, stated in 1896 that, “Beit, Barnato and their fellow-Jews [aimed for] an Anglo-Hebraic Empire in Africa stretching from Egypt to Cape Colony.” Any such sentiments today are, of course, damned by the Left as “nazism” and “racism.” 12 – D. Pallister, S. Stewart, and I. Lepper, South Africa Inc.: The Oppenheimer Empire (London: Corgi Books, 1988), pp. 78-80.
    13 – Ibid., p. 91.
    14 – H. F. Oppenheimer, Africa South, 1960, cited by Ivor Benson, Behind Communism in Africa (Pinetown, South Africa: Dolphin Press, 1975), p. 14. (Available from Renaissance Press, New Zealand).
    15 – Harry F. interviewed by Brian Hackland, Johannesburg, October 30, 1978, cited in D. Pallister et al., p. 87. 16 – D. Pallister, et al., p. 80.
    17 – N. Chomsky, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky (New York: The New York Press, 2002), pp. 88-89. 18 – For example, read: H. F. Verwoerd, “The Rights of the White Man in Africa,” Parliamentary speech, March 9, 1960, reprinted in A Salute to Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd & the Boer Folk, pp. 18-24. 19 – D. Pallister, et al., p. 98.
    20 – N. R. Mandela, “The Shifting Sands of Illusion,” Liberation, June 1953, http://www.africawithin.com/mandela/shifting_sands_0653.htm
    21 – N. R. Mandela, “Eulogy: Harry Oppenheimer,” September 4, 2000, Time, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,997869,00.html
    22 – N. R. Mandela, Financial Mail, June 7, 1996. Cited by Clive Barnett, “The Limits of media democratisation in South Africa: politics, privatisation and regulation,” Media, Culture & Society (London: Sage Publications), p. 655, http://rcirib.ir/articles/pdfs/cd1%5CIngenta_Sage_Articles_on_194_225_11_89/Ingenta751.pdf
    23 – C. Mostert, “Economic Policy Co-Coordinator for the Economic Transformation Committee of the NEC of the African National Congress,” Reflections on South Africa’s Restructuring of State-Owned Enterprises, Occasional Papers No. 5, (Johannesburg: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, March 2002), http://library.fes.de/pdffiles/bueros/suedafrika/07164.pdf Ibid., p. 13.
    24 – Ibid., p. 18. 25 – ANC Daily News Briefing, June 27, 2001

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s