A post retrieved from the Chateau Library of Lustful Congress explored findings from the darkest nooks of SCIENCE that there are genes which affect the ability to empathize, and that these empathy-boosting genes are more prevalent in White than in blacks.
In terms of destructive power on the shitlib psyche, that study is a MOAD (Mother Of All Dissonances). FACT CHECKS that strongly suggest empathy varies by race naturally lead to forbidden thoughts that the MORALITY which emerges from instinctive feelings of empathy varies by race. If one race is less able to empathize with an individual’s suffering or perspective, that race likely has evolved a moral impulse that is incompatible with the morality that governs societies created and maintained by races with greater empathetic ability.
Racial differences in moral feeling are even more nuclear to liberal sensitivities and their equalism ideology than are findings that mean IQ differs by race. It’s like taking a libfruit’s id and squeezing it until all the seeds of her self-worth squirt out onto the ground.
When you have an equalist priest on the ropes, you don’t give him a mercy time-out. You keep pummeling him until he collapses to the mat. With that in mind, here comes the knockout punch:
It’s in Danish, but my blurb above summarizes the findings (which were reported in a far left Danish paper). If there’s an enterprising CH reader who can translate for us, I’d welcome it. FYI, you can read “non-Western kids” as “non-White kids”, because in Denmark that accurately describes most of the immigrants.
We have a disease in White Western societies. It’s a condition called empathobesity, and in a globalist world with open borders and cheap airfare it will mean the self-annihilation of the West if a cure isn’t found soon.
All human groups — races and ethnies — vary in their moral dispositions. Some races are on average, quite simply, more moral than other races, if we measure morality by the utopian standard of WEIRDO liberal orthodoxy. Even within White nations, there will be variance in moral feeling among different White and quasi-White groups. More tribalistic Whites that have evolved to be clannish (or haven’t evolved away from clannishness) will have a comparatively stunted ability to empathize with strangers. Their moral reasoning will seem to emerge from without rather than from within, and it will lack the distinctive character of self-reflection that typifies the moral reasoning of NW White Europeans. It will be as if these less empathetic peoples were “deaf inside”.
Consequently, if we let more of these inwardly deaf races of people into the Anglosphere, they will remake their new nations in the image of their morally primitive homelands, and the morality that self-righteous White liberals take for granted as a foundation for their system of law and informal rules of social interaction will slowly, inexorably, disappear from the face of the earth, leaving their cherished constitutions worth no more than the memories evoked in old-timers who lived through the Dispossession Wars.
Because I’ve got somber news for liberals reading this: Don’t expect history to be on your side for much longer. In game theoretic match-ups, low-empathy ethnocentrism reproductively out-competes high-empathy humanitarianism. The fate of people who believe in leftoid equalism isn’t one world; it’s a world without them.